Tuesday, April 19, 2022

NSE Rot Runs Much Deeper

It is much deeper and goes way beyond the former managing director of National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) and the Himalayan Yogi.

The yogi's blessings were running the world's largest derivatives exchange as per Chitra Ramkrishna, its former managing director.


Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has documented a 190-page order released on 11th February. She was communicating with the Himalayan Yogi through her e-mail.


A Paramahansa who resides in the Himalayan ranges whom she met in holy places. No locational co-ordinates are given. These baffling details made NSE the laughing stock of the world.


The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is investigating this case and has arrested the Himalayan Yogi, Anand Subramanian. He was appointed by Ramakrishna in violation of all rules, got astronomical perks, promotions and increments, violating established processes.


More arrests are likely, for the co-location scam at the NSE which happened between 2010 and 2014. A few brokers with unauthorised and preferential access to NSE's co-location servers earned huge profits.


NSE is a high-technology platform having near monopoly control over India's capital market.


How has it become a hotbed of scams and scandals? The million dollar question which all in our community are asking.


Behind the enormous commercial success, NSE is a symbol of absolute power. It has a history of bending rules to suit its ambitions and suppress competition. Its founders Ravi Narain and Ramkrishna used its monopoly power for regulatory capture.


SEBI allowed NSE to expand into new businesses, ignoring conflicts of interest, make illegal appointments to top posts, and work ruthlessly to destroy any competition.


But the MD communicating with a yogi for guidance on running the exchange is still a surprise.


How did NSE, operating in a sensitive and highly regulated sector, overseen by a high-profile board, SEBI, and the finance ministry, acquire such enormous power and abuse it with exemption from any punishment for so long? It is with the help of the same people responsible for its oversight.


Who Wields Power at NSE


Over 15 years, Narain and Ramakrishna ensured that NSE's board members were selected to ensure dedicated and unconditional support after having delegated far-reaching powers to the MD.


Hence, when SEBI asked NSE about the algo scam, the board's first reaction was there were no irregularities.


This was no surprise as the same board had irregularly appointed Ramkrishna as MD in 2013.


The NSE board constituted a selection committee of Ravi Narain, S H Khan (former chairman of NSE and IDBI), S Venkiteswaran (former NSE director and senior advocate), and Deepak Satwalekar (public interest director) on November 6, 2012.


The committee met soon to strongly recommend an internal candidate and Ramkrishna was appointed for five years.


SEBI's mandatory approval was not sought.


None was considered for the post, but the committee's mandate was to shortlist candidates from within NSE, from other exchanges, from the financial sector and exchanges globally.


For the kind of money NSE was paying it would have attracted the best from exchanges globally.


The much smaller Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) had put together a crack team of professionals who had worked at the New York Stock Exchange and Chicago Mercantile Exchange.


While recommending Ramkrishna as MD, the committee also created a brand new designation of non-executive vice-chairman for Ravi Narain, ignoring the fact that NSE could not possibly have both, chairman and vice-chairman, in non-executive posts.


It was as if NSE was a personal kingdom of people from the founding team and when one of them stepped down, the next would automatically step in while the former was accommodated in another capacity.


The board saw nothing strange in Ramkrishna appointing Subramanian immediately after becoming MD without any discussion with the Nominations and Recruitment committee (NRC) and bypassing all SEBI rules.


It apparently remained silent when he was promoted to Group Operating Officer, again bypassing the NRC as well as stringent regulatory compliances and clearances.


Surprise. Surprise. He was even kept out of the list of key management personnel, while enjoying the second highest remuneration and perks and being appointed to the boards of all NSE subsidiaries.


Key Managerial Personnel ("KMP") refers to the whole-time employees of the company who are vested with the most important roles and responsibilities. They are the first point of contact between the company and its stakeholders and are responsible for the formulation of strategies and their implementation.


He had absolutely no experience of capital markets or technology to run a large and complex exchange.


The NSE ecosystem of influence is so strong that even after Ramkrishna left under a cloud, it did not bother to find someone within India or abroad with specific skills and qualifications to run it.


Instead, it chose a successor who had no experience of running an exchange, a real-time trading technology platform or capital market regulations.


The NSE scam and its abuse of power happened under the watchful eyes of three successive SEBI chairmen, the worst happening under C B Bhave and U K Sinha.


So the NSE rot goes far deeper and way beyond the MD and the yogi.


The dignitaries who have been in the NSE's successive boards over the past two decades, the bigwigs at SEBI and key officials in the finance ministry and reportedly a powerful politician have all helped.


If the government is keen on a clean-up, these eminent people must be made answerable.


To be continued


Monday, March 21, 2022

How ABG Shipyard pulled off India's biggest bank fraud - The Story Continues

How ABG Shipyard pulled off India's biggest bank fraud - The Story Continues - 


5 years, 28 banks, Rs 23,000 cr debt. This is how it stands. 

How did the fraud go undetected for so long? How did it come to light? How was the money diverted? And what led to the delay in CBI registering the FIR? All million dollar questions. Let us try to find out all the answers. Like solving a Rubik's cube. 

A sinking shipbuilding firm is behind India’s biggest bank fraud.

Between 2012 and 2017, ABG Shipyard Ltd (ABGSL), a Gujarat-based firm, ostensibly defrauded banks of Rs 22,842 cr. 

The scope and scale of the fraud is overwhelming, but the crux of the deceit was how ABGSL created a web of transactions to cheat a consortium of 28 bankers. Something unheard of. 

ABGSL took loans and diverted them. It made investments in overseas subsidiaries, bought assets in the names of affiliated companies, and also transferred funds to several related parties.

Its account became a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) in 2013, violating terms of its arrangement for Corporate Debt Restructuring (CDR) — a relief mechanism in which lender banks either reduce the interest rates on the loans or increase the term of repayment.

The clamor around the issue has been aggravated by the fact that the case is troubled with delays. SBI identified the fraud in January 2019, but filed a complaint only in November. A fresh and detailed complaint was filed in August 2020, but the CBI finally registered a case only on 7 February 2022, and booked ABGSL and ABG International Private Ltd.

It booked ABGSL’s former chairman and managing director Rishi Kamlesh Agarwal, former executive director Santhanam Muthaswamy, and directors Ashwini Kumar, Sushil Kumar Agarwal, and Ravi Vimal Nevatia. Searches were also conducted leading to the recovery of damning documents.

A forensic audit blew the cover

The fraud came to light during a forensic audit that Ernst and Young LLP (EY) conducted in January 2019, from April 2012 to July 2017. It found that the fraud had taken place during this period as per the FIR.

The fraud was conducted through diversion of funds, misappropriation, criminal breach of trust, to illegally gain at the cost of the bank’s funds. SBI has said this in its complaint.

As per the FIR, ABGSL now owes a total of Rs 22,842 cr. It owes ICICI (which was leading the consortium) Rs 7,089 cr, SBI Rs 2,925 cr, IDBI Bank Rs 3,639 cr, Bank of Baroda Rs 1,614 cr, Punjab National Bank Rs 1,244 cr, Exim Bank Rs 1,327 cr, Indian Overseas Bank Rs 1,244 cr and Bank of India Rs 719 cr, among others.

While the loans were given to ABGSL between 2005 and 2010, the fraud was detected only after the forensic audit. The SBI in its complaint said that the fraud occurred between 2011 and 2017.

It appears that the funds were given without due diligence from the banks. The fraud amount under investigation could be more or less than what is reflected right now.

Loan money given to related parties, invested overseas

ABGSL routed the loan money by paying it to related parties.

The forensic audit — based on the ledgers of One Ocean Shipping Private Ltd (OOSPL) and ABG Engineering and Construction (ABG EC) Ltd— noted that money was transferred to another company called PFS Shipping India Ltd. which adjusted the receivables to ABGSL.

Transfer entities show that in previous years ABGSL had transferred funds to OOSPL and ABG EC.

The money borrowed from banks was used to repay loans and pay for other expenses of group companies, as well as for letters of credit.

Moreover, according to the Master Restructuring Agreement (MRA), ABGSL should have recovered investment of Rs 236 cr made by its subsidiary ABG Shipyard Singapore in the units of Standard Chartered Trust within two months from the date of Corporate Debt Reconstruction. Instead, ABGSL allegedly invested US$ 43 M in ABG Singapore, which was then potentially diverted.

It had sought permission to invest in overseas subsidiaries, which is a general business practice. But a huge chunk was re-routed for some other purpose, other than what was declared. The money was diverted to tax havens.

Web of transactions

There are indications of properties being purchased by related or linked parties from funds provided by ABGSL.

After review of annual reports of ABGSL for FY 2014-15 and ledgers it appears that it had paid accommodation deposits worth Rs 83 cr to companies like Aries Management Services, GC Properties, Gold Croft Properties, before review period (in 2007-08). And they were related to ABGSL and its promoters

On review of the financial statements of these companies, it seems  that properties were purchased out of security deposits provided by ABGSL during the same year.

Based on bank book ledgers, on 15 and 16 March 2016, funds worth Rs 15 cr and 16 cr respectively were transferred to ABG Energy by ABGSL.

Also, funds amounting to Rs 31 cr were received from ABG International Private Ltd in the form of refund of accommodation deposits.

This indicates that there may not be actual refund of accommodation deposits previously paid by ABGSL amounting to Rs 31 cr and only potential circular transactions.

These transactions indicate that assets (properties) were purchased out of the funds provided by ABGSL but were not part of the fixed assets in the books of ABGSL.

It collected back all the deposits paid by it to owners on termination of lease, leave and licence.

The amount was received back from ABG International Private Limited. On review of the bank book, it noted that out of Rs 300 cr, Rs 95 cr might have been bought in via circular transaction in April 2014 as outflow to linked parties and inflow from ABG International on the same date.

It is a very complex case as far as the transactions are concerned. The money has been paid, then sent back to the same accounts, then routed to different accounts of different entities.

Global crisis hit the company

ABGSL, flagship company of the ABG Group, engaged in shipbuilding and repair, was incorporated in 1985, has shipyards in Dahej and Surat in Gujarat. It was financed under consortium arrangement with 28 banks. The leading bank was ICICI.

It was affected by the global financial crisis of 2008, leading to it becoming a non-performing asset.

ABGSL constructed over 165 vessels in the last 16 years, including specialised vessels like newsprint carriers, self-discharging and loading bulk cement carriers but the global crisis impacted the shipping industry and hit the company.

Hence, there was paucity of working capital causing significant increase in the operating cycle, aggravating the liquidity and financial problem.

The account became an NPA on 30 November 2013.

Several efforts were made to revive ABGSL’s operations. This included restructuring the account under the CDR mechanism in March 2014 by all lenders. However, as the shipping industry was going through the worst ever down turn, the operations of the company could not revive.

Without demand for commercial vessels and no fresh defense orders, it was finding it difficult to abide by the CDR. Thus, it was unable to service the interest and installments on the due date.

As restructuring failed, the account was classified as NPA in July 2016 with effect from 30 November 2013.

ABGSL may have violated the corporate debt restructuring arrangement, which mentioned that all cash inflows should be routed through the trust and retention account.

The delay in flagging fraud, registering of case

Although the fraud was identified by June 2019 by a Fraud Identification Committee in a meeting, the first complaint to CBI was made by SBI only in November 2019.

The SBI said there was no effort to delay the process.

CBI said that there was no delay in filing the FIR. The various complex transactions were being looked into. Not all transactions are dubious — one has to identify when and how the fraud has occurred, which takes time. The investigation is on.

Consent to lodge a formal complaint from other consortium member banks was not received when the fraud was identified in 2019 or even when the first complaint was filed. It was only in meetings held with all stakeholders between June and August 2020 that the issue of providing consent to file a complaint was raised and received.

EY is likely to be the key prosecution witness in India's biggest bank fraud. The audit report will be examined. EY may be quizzed by CBI. The audit report will be examined to ascertain if it missed any lapses. Depending on the evidence CBI will decide who will be prosecuted and who will be made a witness. 

Lookout circulars have been issued against the accused and senior people of ABGSL to stop them from leaving the country via airports and border crossings.

Note - This article was first published on LInkedIn on 15th February, 2022

To be continued

CBI books ABG Shipyard, its directors in the biggest bank fraud of Rs 22,842 cr

 #supriowrites #abg #abgshipyard


CBI books ABG Shipyard, its directors in the biggest bank fraud of Rs 22,842 cr


ABG Shipyard Limited (ABGSL) one of India’s largest private sector shipyard firm, has been booked by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for defrauding 28 banks to the tune of Rs 22,842 cr.


It is one of the biggest bank fraud (bigger than Punjab National Bank scam involving Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi) cases which the CBI will be investigating.


As per the FIR filed on complaint of State Bank of India (SBI), the forensic audit report revealed that from April 2012 to July 2017, the accused connived with each other and committed illegal activities including diversion of funds, misappropriation, and criminal breach of trust for purposes other than for which the funds were released by the bank.


ABG group is promoted by Rishi Agarwal, and has been a major player in the Indian ship building industry.


ABGSL has capacity to build vessels up to 18,000 dead weight tonnage (DWT) at Surat Shipyard and 1,20,000 DWT at Dahej Shipyard.


Global crisis has impacted the shipping industry. There was sufficient fall in commodity demand and prices and cargo demand. The cancellation of contracts for few ships and vessels piled up inventory. This led to paucity of working capital and increase in the operating cycle aggravating the liquidity problem and financial problem.


There was no demand of commercial vessels as the industry was on a downturn even in 2015. There was no fresh defense orders release in 2015. ABGSL was finding it very difficult to achieve milestones as envisaged in CDR. Hence it was unable to service the interest and instalments on due date.


ABGSL has been referred to NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) of Ahmedabad bench which had allowed the official liquidator for the company to carry out a private sale of the assets.


ABGSL owes Rs 2,925 cr to SBI, Rs 7,089 cr to ICICI Bank, Rs 3,634 cr to IDBI Bank, Rs 1,614 cr to Bank of Baroda, Rs 1,244 cr to PNB and Rs 1,228 cr to Indian Overseas Bank.


Note - This article has been first published on LInkedIN on 12th February, 2022


To be continued